Fast Film Reviews

Gone with the Wind

It’s probably been two decades since I’ve watched Gone with the Wind. Not because I don’t think it’s a wonderful movie, because I do. It’s just that it’s such a time commitment. Its extreme length is a barrier to wanting to re-watch it again. So when Warner Bros. sent me a complementary copy of this historical saga – on Blu-ray no less – I knew the divine movie gods were calling on me to re-visit this tale set during the American Civil War. It also gave me the opportunity to share the experience with some friends who had never seen the film.

I enjoy pointing out that when adjusting for box office inflation, Gone with the Wind is the highest grossing film of all time, even to this day. Nothing comes close. 1977’s Star Wars is the nearest challenger.  It’s a record that will probably never change. So much time has passed since it was released, I think people now assume its success was a foregone conclusion at the time. But Gone with the Wind is rather unconventional. It’s almost 4 hours long, asks us to embrace a female protagonist that behaves in a totally selfish manner and it dares to tell a story of the American Civil War from a white Southern point of view. What surprises is regardless of these questionable distinctions, the drama is a triumph. An engrossing melodramatic romance that manages to entertain on a level in a way few ever even attempt, let alone accomplish. It broke all the rules and still exists as one of the cinema’s most beloved works.

Gone with the Wind is an absolute landmark in filmmaking. Despite its grandiosity, it remains at heart the tale of a man and woman. Scarlett O’Hara is not a typical protagonist. She is selfish, spoiled and insensitive. I dare say she’s a character you’d hate in the hands of a lesser actress. But she’s resourceful and driven as well so we don’t dislike her, not entirely anyway. She‘s too determined and spirited. She’s a bit pathetic too. Her love for her  sister-in-law’s husband, Ashley Wilkes, is both inappropriate and tragic at the same time. Vivien Leigh’s work as Scarlet would not be so engaging if she hadn’t been matched every step of the way by Clark Gable as Rhett Butler. An infamous blockade runner for the Confederacy, his reputation is less than honorable. Intelligent and confident, but also morally questionable.  He is a complicated fellow. Throughout the drama, he is fascinated by Scarlett and her scrappy ways, but he’s frustrated by her ongoing obsession with Ashley Wilkes. His feelings for Scarlet are perfectly believable, in the face of her fickle behavior. Nothing against Robert Donat’s solid work in Goodbye, Mr. Chips, but the fact that Clark Gable did not win for his performance, is one of the great injustices of the Academy Awards. The fact that the movie received ten Oscars is a consolation of sorts, I suppose.

The magnificence of Gone with the Wind goes far beyond our two principals. Clark Gable and Vivien Leigh could have rendered the rest of the cast as unimportant. However, Leslie Howard, Olivia de Havilland, Hattie McDaniel, Thomas Mitchell and Butterfly McQueen contribute significantly in key roles throughout the plot. Every one of them giving an iconic performance that keeps the narrative engrossing. Adapting Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer-winning 1936 novel into a gripping and coherent film was not an easy task. Costumes, music, set design, screenplay and cinematography – everything is first rate and presented in a scope never seen before or since. The undertaking was so massive that in many cases, multiple people worked on these elements that weren’t even credited. Orchestrating all of these diverse talents and egos into the cohesive machine that produced this work of art was producer David O. Selznick. It was a colossal production. Given the stakes involved, this could have easily been an expensive disaster. His importance to the success of the picture cannot be overstated. Selznick would produce many classics during his tenure in Hollywood (Rebecca, Spellbound, Duel in the Sun, The Third Man). However Gone with the Wind would endure as his most notable accomplishment.

What else can I offer that hasn’t been already said a million times before? Any film that can run 3 hours and 42 minutes without ever failing to hold the viewer’s interest, is an achievement in itself. Then there’s the cast, everyone deserving of an Academy Award for their emotionally involving work. Add to that the costumes, music, set design that make up the grand historical sweep and you‘ve got a story that astonishes.  To watch this spectacle is to witness the textbook case of how to render an epic. It dazzles in its breadth, and yet at its core, it remains the simple tale of a woman resolved not to lose her Tara, the cotton plantation she calls home. Enter the charming rogue, Rhett, she beguiles and is beguiled by. Watching these two, it’s impossible not to get caught up in their situation. Yes Gone with the Wind is an account on the grandest scale imaginable, but it’s also a story about compelling people. At heart, that is what truly engages in a film that became a cultural phenomenon. It’s the kind of artistic display that makes you truly “give a damn.”

17 Responses

  1. I have never seen this, but by your review and others this seems like a true classic through and through. I will try to see this whenever I get the chance. Excellent review.

  2. I love this film. I saw it when I was ten, and I’m still surprised it endured all four hours, especially for someone that young. I’m thinking about giving it a second viewing this summer when I have a moment. Great review.

  3. I reviewed this a while back and I think it stands up better than almost any other pre-civil rights war films. This film manages to avoid some of the gross stereotyping Hollywood loved to use. As a whole this is one of the best movies ever made.

    1. It’s entertainment on scale rarely seen. If ever there was a film where you could say, “They don’t make them like they used to” this is the perfect example.

  4. Wow! What can I say. Saw this for the first time. It was awesome. Every bit of it was worth my time. The acting, the music, the cinimatoghraphy. It was all equally amazing. In 2012, it stands as fresh now. As I’m sure it did when it was released. Great great movie.

  5. Beautiful review. It’s very hard to write about classics such as this, but you did a magnificent job. I only saw this for the first time a couple of years ago and I bet it’ll be a few more before I do it again because, like you said, it’s such a time commitment.

    1. Warner Bros. invited a small group of movie lovers to receive various new release and classic Blu-ray movie titles. I share my thoughts about the Blu-ray movies they send on my blog. It’s just as wonderful as it sounds.

  6. It’s not the best Civil War movie I have ever seen. I think the second half of the film is somewhat weak in compare to the first half. Also, let’s be honest, it’s portrayal of race and gender issues is rather questionable. And the argument that it’s a film of “its time” doesn’t really excuse it for me. But overall, it’s a rather epic film that has somewhat held up over time.

    1. Re: “gender issues” I am reminded of this quote from http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/gonewith/themes.html

      “Despite the severe gender inequality of their time, women in Gone with the Wind show strength and intelligence that equals or bests the strength and intelligence of men. Scarlett is cunning and manipulates men with ease. She runs Tara when her father falls ill, and eventually realizes that she has a better head for business than most men.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *