Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

 photo fantastic_beasts_and_where_to_find_them_ver4_zpsqgp7sexh.jpg photo starrating-3stars.jpgIt’s been 5 years since the Harry Potter series ended in 2011. That saga may be over and done, but it doesn’t mean we can’t revisit the world. In 2001, J.K. Rowling published what was purportedly one of Harry Potter’s textbooks from Hogwarts, the school of witchcraft and wizardry. The plotless tome was attributed to one Newt Scamander. He’s a wizard with special knowledge in magical creatures. From that slender 128-page volume comes Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. Four additional sequels are in the works as well. Harry Potter addicts, come get your fix!

Fantastic Beasts is actually set in a time well before a lad named Harry Potter ever even existed in a land far removed from the UK – New York city in the 1920s to be exact. Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) arrives there to drop off an animal that rightfully belongs in the U.S. His mysterious briefcase is actually filled with a coterie of enchanted critters. A mix-up at the bank switches his suitcase with a hapless man seeking a loan there named Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler). As a result, some of the creatures are released into the world and it’s up to our timid hero to try and round them up. Assisting him are Porpentina Goldstein (Katherine Waterston), a former Auror and current member of the wizard police. There’s also her big-hearted sister Queenie Goldstein (Alison Sudol).

Fantastic Beasts wastes no time in laying the groundwork for a new cast of wizards and witches. But what can you say about a film where the side characters are more interesting than the leads?  Newt is certainly a peculiar little man. He arrives with disheveled hair cascading down his forehead and a sheepish grin. Eccentric, shy, no wait, make that painfully introverted. The wizard is so soft spoken he tends to mumble his words. It’s an idiosyncratic performance and one that’s a bit hard to warm up to. I honestly couldn’t understand about half of what he said. That’s pretty frustrating when he’s the star of your picture. I wasn’t particularly taken with the businesslike personality of Porpentina either. She’s ho-hum. Her younger sister Queenie, on the contrary, is another story.  Actress Alison Sudol’s wide-eyed, Betty Boop style floozy is a joy. She is a free-spirited woman who can read minds. The singer-turned-actress is such a pleasure. Ditto her romantic rapport with wannabe baker Jacob Kowalski played by Dan Fogler. An ordinary man with no magical ability – he’s what the Brits call a “muggle”. Ah but we’re in America now so we’re told the term here is a “No-Maj”. Ok, whatever. He’s great regardless of what vocabulary you use define him. The two have palpable charisma together. Whenever they were on screen I was captivated. Can these two get a spin-off?

The leisurely paced narrative is not in a hurry to get anywhere. That’s fine because it’s the creation of a fictional world that is this production’s strong point. The meandering account is introduced when Jacob Kowalski and Newt Scamander accidentally switch luggage. The event is more of a conduit through which to introduce a menagerie of various living things that escape from his bag. I loved the Niffler. A mischievous critter that looked like a platypus but roughly the size of a mole. He’s a tiny scamp. There’s also a Bowtruckle named Pickett. He’s a pocket creature that resembled a twig-like man. Think mini-Groot from Guardian of the Galaxy. There are other animals and they’re all rendered beautifully. I don’t know if CGI is just getting better or I’ve been beaten down by such a reliance on these special effects in modern movies that I’ve just come to accept them. The phantasmagorical displays are easy on the eyes.

At best, the unfocused production is a visual delight. At worst, the dark developments are tonally odd . There’s a tiresome subplot about repressive fascists. Crusader Mary Lou (Samantha Morton) is head of an extremist group against wizards and magic. She thinks children should muzzle their magical gifts. It’s like X-Men but for toddlers. This makes them quietly go crazy. Ezra Miller is Credence Barebone, her troubled adopted son. Miller is normally a dynamic presence. I’ve enjoyed his work since the very beginning of his career. Yet here he is given little to do other than sleepwalk through the chronicle as a catatonic creep. Colin Farrell as Percival Graves is better but not by much. His poorly defined character is tasked with tracking down Newt. He changes in a way that is both confusing and dispiriting. I could say more, but I consider spoilers to be verboten.

There’s a lot to recommend. This should satisfy both Harry Potter fans and fantasy enthusiasts as well. Director David Yates is back. He brings his quirky aesthetic to this new film and the touch is welcome. He directed the last four installments of the Harry Potter series and he will direct all 5 of these films as well. On the other hand, Steve Kloves, who adapted every Potter movies except Order of the Phoenix, is only a producer here. This time the script is penned by none other than author Dame J. K. Rowling herself. This is her first screenplay. She pretty much had free reign to adapt her work any way she saw fit. We get a wandering two-hour plus movie from a meager story thread. Fantastic Beasts is a suitably accomplished escapist adventure. However the attempts to mix upbeat fantasy with something more sinister, fall flat. At best, the tale is a fanciful stroll through a dreamlike world. Nicely photographed, with a lush score and special effects galore; these all unite to create an occasionally bewitching imaginary universe.

11-18-16

14 responses to “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them”

  1. Great review. I think you like being in fantasy worlds more than I do. I was disappointed by this and more I think about it more sour I feel. A real missed opportunity and very overrated. I had a hard time understanding Redmayne in the role, which is a big problem for a lead character

    Like

    1. You sound so negative, but I just read your review. I don’t think we have ever agreed more perfectly on a film. There’s the good: the chemistry of Jacob & Queenie, the colorful beasts like the Niffler. Then there’s the bad: Eddie Redmayne mumbled dialogue along with the schizophrenic dark tone in a film that was mostly lighthearted. We are so totally in unison on this.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Just read it again. You’re right. We really do agree on this film. Sorry!

        Like

  2. Yeah sorry for sounding negative. Just been bothered by Harry Potter fanboys for not loving their movie. It’s true. We really are on same page on this.

    Like

    1. Yeah it’s not spectacular and perhaps that affected you more than I. It’s not horrible though. I had enough fun to give it 3/5 stars. But no I won’t be revisiting this film anytime soon.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Agreed. They really made some strange choices. I wish they’d make the whole movie about Queenie and Jacob

        Like

      2. Agreed. They are the stars in my own re-edited version in my head. 😂 😂 😂

        Liked by 1 person

      3. What do you like better this or Miss Peregrine’s?

        Like

      4. They’re pretty comparable. I gave them the same rating. If I had to choose, I’d go with Fantastic Beasts.

        Liked by 1 person

      5. Cool. 🙂

        Like

  3. Cute movie. I loved all the creative creatures. Not a great movie, but fun. 3 1/2 stars

    Like

  4. I haven’t seen Fantastic Beasts, but I have heard the same sentiment you point out: that the side characters are more interesting than the main ones, particularly Queenie and Jacob. Your quick dismissal of the term “No-Maj” gave me a chuckle. Most of your other critiques about its tiresome fascist subplot and sleepy performance by Ezra Miller, I’ve heard from friends as well, so seems like you’re right on the money about the movie. Based on your description, it seems like there are certainly some fun elements in the film, but I’ve never been into Harry Potter, so I can’t imagine myself seeing it unless circumstances force me to.

    Like

    1. I’d still check it out. This was among the big hits of the 2016 holiday season. Plus it just won an Oscar (Costume Design).

      Like

Leave a comment