Archive for December, 2019
Waves
Posted in Drama, Romance with tags 2019 on December 31, 2019 by Mark HobinWaves is a drama that gradually becomes an epic. It concerns a typical suburban family as they navigate that roadmap of emotional complexities that we call life. The chronicle begins rather deceptively as a simple melodrama. Tyler Williams (Kelvin Harrison Jr.) is a popular high school senior. He’s a smart kid and a star athlete with a bright future. Depending on your age, he could be your best friend or perhaps your son. But things aren’t always what they seem. As we are introduced to the characters that populate Tyler‘s reality, there is an inherent sense of foreboding. He’s constantly pushed to be better by his father Ronald (Sterling K. Brown). His stepmother Catherine (Renée Elise Goldsberry) is less domineering and more compassionate. His younger sister Emily (Taylor Russell) is also a calming presence. He spends time with his girlfriend Alexis (Alexa Demie). Things appear stable but soon that will change. Tyler begins to suffer some setbacks. The way he deals with misfortune will have a profound effect.
Director Trey Edward Shults masterfully illuminates how the choices we make can affect what happens to us for the rest of our lives. That would be enough. What augments the film into something more is the about-face that he takes in the middle of the story where a major event completely shifts the spotlight from one character to another. A dreadful act appears to signify an end but in fact, the narrative is taking on a new beginning. It is that transfer of focus where the movie becomes something much greater. We now see the scope of action from a different angle – how the decisions of one can alter the lives of another. The intensity of the portrait is magnified by the stunning cinematography by Drew Daniels and an abstract score by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross. Both intensify an elegiac mood.
Waves is an ambitious tale. Yet director Trey Edward Shults makes it seem effortless. That elevates his achievement into something even more affecting. The human experience is multilayered and deep. A split-second decision can affect the rest of our existence. Here, an impulsive choice made in the heat of the moment is the impetus for a demoralizing change. A life filled with joy can transform into one filled with unendurable pain. Shults’ camera is like a voyeur lingering on the interactions of a family in places where we should not be. His unflinching gaze presents a snapshot that is both heartbreakingly beautiful and extremely ugly. The depiction will inspire an individual to reflect on their own behavior. We may consider ourselves good people at heart. Yet we can behave in unforgivably grotesque ways. Director Schultz beautifully realized account details that idea in the extreme but in doing so he brilliantly ruminates over the idea of what it means to be human.
12-05-19
The Mustang
Posted in Drama with tags 2019 on December 31, 2019 by Mark HobinThere’s a poignant simplicity that elevates this tale of redemption. Sometimes an uncomplicated, straightforward account about human change can profoundly move the heart. The Mustang is just such a film.
Roman Coleman is a convict at the Northern Nevada Correctional Center who has trouble controlling his anger. He’s currently serving a 12-year sentence for a shocking burst of domestic violence against his wife. The result of which had tragic consequences. He’s given a second chance at social rehabilitation when he’s admitted into the Wild Horse Inmate Program. There he’s entrusted with the care of a crazed mustang that has been extremely difficult to restrain. It’s not hard to see the spiritual connection drawn between man and beast. His efforts to “break” the savage animal are the subject of powerful scenes with a visual grandeur sans dialogue. Their relationship is merely composed of gestures and expressions. It is here that Roman begins to come to terms with his own failings.
Matthias Schoenaerts is a star in the classic Hollywood tradition – a time when men conveyed forceful resolve simply through a strong, stoic silence. They didn’t talk a lot. They didn’t have to. They dominated without speaking. These rugged individuals obviously had feelings but it was buried beneath a veneer of stoicism and it added to their mystique. The less we knew, the more charismatic they became. John Wayne, Robert Mitchum, Steve McQueen – These durable icons were the definition of cool. Matthias Schoenaerts has the physicality of a tough guy but that determination belies a deep unspoken sensitivity. In films such as Bullhead, Rust and Bone and Far from the Madding Crowd, Matthias Schoenaerts has given one arresting performance after another. The actor propels The Mustang into a fascinating character study.
There’s a poetic realism that underlies this depiction. The Wild Horse Inmate Program detailed here is a real thing. It provides an effective setting where violent criminals interact with barbaric creatures and the alliance can effectively tame them. Ah, but who is pacifying who? Part prison drama, part traditional western, director Laure de Clermont-Tonnerre in her feature debut, deals with timeworn themes but reinterprets them in a way that feels fresh and invigorating. Humans and animals often share an implicit bond. Sometimes that association can be quite stirring. De Clermont-Tonnerre explores that connection with unsentimental but deeply moving style. The Mustang will speak to that spirit. I was captivated by the portrait.
04-05-19
1917
Posted in Action, Drama, War with tags 2019 on December 27, 2019 by Mark HobinIt’s no secret that films set during the Second World War far outnumber ones about other wars. Since 1998, the more well-known ones include Saving Private Ryan, The Thin Red Line, The Pianist, Letters from Iwo Jima, Fury, Hacksaw Ridge, Darkest Hour, and Dunkirk. There are so many others. My apologies if I missed your favorite. But what about pictures concerning the Great War? Some WWI movies rank among the greatest classics of all time: All Quiet on the Western Front, The Grand Illusion, Paths of Glory and Lawrence of Arabia. I wouldn’t immediately include a movie that just came out in the same company. Likewise, I would never describe a current release using the M-word*. A certain amount of time must pass. I’d say at least 10 years. However, 1917 is a good candidate to be considered both of these things in 2029.
1917 is an epic about two British soldiers entrusted with a mission. The story is based on an account told to director Sam Mendes by his paternal grandfather, Alfred Mendes. Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) and Schofield (George MacKay) are two lance corporals that must deliver a message across enemy German territory to an Allied front line. The British are preparing to launch an ambush but the problem is, it will lead to many many deaths on the side of the Allies. The soldiers have a false sense of security. The Germans are in fact ready for the British and therefore should not attack. Blake and Schofield must convey an order to stand down. Their journey is the movie.
1917 is filmed in one continuous shot. When I first heard that, I regarded the decision to use this technique as a pretentious affectation. Birdman did this rather famously in 2014. No, cinematographer Roger Deakins didn’t really shoot without stopping. If he had, filming would have only taken one hour and 59 minutes. However, the narrative has pieced together that way and the approach is indeed a very intrinsic part of the story that lends the adventure an immersive quality. I forgot it was filmed this way because I was fully engrossed in the feature. It is brilliantly shot and expertly staged. The scenes are occasionally shot 360 degrees as it moves around the action and it brought me to the feeling that I was right there with them on this expedition. There are stretches where I watched with held breath. I didn’t feel as though I was watching a movie. I was a solider on this mission with them.
This is, in fact, a good time for movies about World War I. Peter Jackson’s gloriously spellbinding documentary They Shall Not Grow got a limited release at the tail end of 2018. It too was magnificent but I wasn’t prepared for another tour de force. 1917 is an absolutely penetrating albeit manipulative achievement about courage. Our two heroes travel through a landscape that invokes anxiety and fear on a scale of biblical proportions. The chronicle is directed and produced by Sam Mendes with a screenplay he wrote withy Krysty Wilson-Cairns. It features stellar cinematography from the aforementioned Roger Deakins and a rousing score by Thomas Newman that already feels iconic. Together they combine to form this artistic success. It’s horrific and beautiful, mesmerizing and immediate. If cinema is an emotional experience — a portal that transports us to another time and place — then 1917 inspired the most visceral reaction of any picture I saw in 2019. The majesty of it all blew me away.
* “masterpiece”.
12-03-19
Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
Posted in Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Science Fiction with tags 2019 on December 22, 2019 by Mark HobinStar Wars: The Rise of Skywalker might have set a record for the number of spontaneous bursts of applause I’ve ever experienced during a theatrical screening. I stopped counting when it reached double digits. It was an absolute love fest. My reaction was less enthusiastic but I can appreciate why the crowd embraced this so gleefully. The chronicle is heavy on scenes and displays that are specifically designed to appeal to longtime fans of the Star Wars franchise — especially admirers of the first set (and best) of three films often referred to as the classic trilogy. Director J.J. Abrams is a master at giving people exactly what they want. That is both boon and bane to the grand narrative arc of the three most recent Star Wars episodes.
J.J. Abrams was faced with an epic task. First, he had to close out the sequel trilogy which he began with The Force Awakens in 2015, but also cap off the entire “Skywalker Saga” of nine movies. He only partially succeeds as the three chapters linked do not fit together as a cohesive whole. I enjoyed Rian Johnson’s subversive take in the 2nd movie because he brought innovation and unexpected change to the franchise. However, it was not meant to be. From a story standpoint, it now feels like Abrams directed The Force Awakens with an idea of where he wanted the adventure to go. Then the series was hijacked by filmmaker Rian Johnson in The Last Jedi who introduced plot elements and personalities only to have Abrams either ignore them or explain them away with The Rise of Skywalker as a course-correcting measure. This is true with the character of Rose Tico (Kelly Marie Tran), a mechanic of the resistance that was a huge part of The Last Jedi but now only registers as a gloried cameo typing away at a computer here. Be warned there will be other adjustments made in the name of retroactive continuity. What I’m about to say isn’t a spoiler because it’s revealed in the opening crawl. Somehow a resurrected emperor Palpatine returns (Ian McDiarmid) as the Big Bad. Meanwhile, Snoke (Andy Serkis) has been rendered as a nonentity.
J.J. Abrams’ vision of Star Wars is more focused on the meticulous crafting of visual style at the expense of logical developments. That’s not to say that The Rise of Skywalker isn’t enjoyable. It’s hugely entertaining. The audience in my theater were laughing, crying, cheering. That audience experienced something akin to a religious experience. There are lots of encounters with fantastic creatures and random humans. Babu Frik is the baby Yoda of this movie. Don’t underestimate this little guy’s power to charm the viewer. Babu Frik reprograms droids and speaks in an incomprehensible but adorable alien language that had my theater enraptured. There’s a cone-headed droid named D-O that behaves like a rehabilitated puppy. Porgs, Ewoks, Jawas, droids all pop up intermittently to satisfy your fan lust for more cute critters. Abrams is adept at manipulating the Star Wars aesthetic in a way that honors the past while fashioning a tale with new personalities.
There’s a dizzying array of human roles too. Numerous individuals pop up, deliver one line and then frustratingly disappear. Abrams prioritizes the wants and needs of the fans over plot, characterization and thematic consistency. Rose Tico has been sidelined. Yet the writers have added other actors that appear to fulfill the same role but then obfuscate the advancement of a singular narrative. Jannah (Naomi Ackie) is an ally of the Resistance who is paired up with Finn. She also has a conversation with Lando Calrissian (Billy Dee Williams) that’s calculated to tease some sort of relationship. Oscar Isaac is back as Poe and he hangs out with an old friend named Zorii Bliss played by Keri Russell. You’d never know it was the actress, however, because she wears a helmet. You only see her eyes in one scene. The inclusion of Jannah and Zorii seems rather pointless. Nevertheless, the cast is filled with beings that all look and sound the part. The villains continue to be cast like actors from the Royal Shakespeare Company. Richard E. Grant’s General Pryde in the First Order looks like a genetic descendant of Peter Cushing’s Grand Moff Tarkin.
Yes, this movie relies on the groundwork that was established long ago. This entry will lack an emotional impact for the uninitiated. It feels a bit like a greatest hits reel where everything but the kitchen sink is thrown in. At one point Rey amusingly utters a declaration that followers will recognize as a variation of “These aren’t the droids you’re looking for”. My theater was erupting in applause at moments that I didn’t even grasp. The gang walks into a droid shop and there’s an old guy with a white beard shaking his head. Everyone started clapping. It was only after the film was over and I consulted the internet that I found out who that was. Abrams even finds a way to include original cast members including (but not limited to) Carrie Fisher, Mark Hamill, and Billy Dee Williams. Fisher passed on in 2016 and so her scenes have been cobbled together from outtakes and pre-recorded dialogue. Her declarations have a vagueness about them but it’s nice to see her. Another character reappears as just a figment of someone’s memory.
The Rise of Skywalker ultimately delivers the satisfying end to — what I like to call — the nonology. The chronicle is well-paced but at 2 hours and 22 minutes, it’s overpacked with too much stuff. It’s messy and incoherent. However, the central trio continues to be a charismatic bunch. Poe (Oscar Isaac) and Finn (John Boyega) bicker like two brothers. They still have a nice dynamic. The main hero, Jedi Knight Rey (Daisy Ridley) gets the lion’s share of the drama. The idea of “The Force” as an all-powerful almost Godlike solution to difficult problems is further promoted. Rey now has abilities so advanced that she can control a spaceship flying overhead simply by outstretching her hand while she is safely on the ground. Apparently, the force can even be manipulated in the same way that Jesus helped Lazarus.
Rey is a captivating heroine and her interaction with Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) is the sentimental core. It shouldn’t be a surprise that there’s a lightsaber duel between the two of them. The fact it’s set against a backdrop of stormy ocean waves that rise and crash all around them truly elevate the action. It ends with a surprising act. Abrams fills his account with sensational set pieces that delight the viewer. Also ** news flash ** there will be a massive air battle between the Rebels and the Empire. Abrams celebrates cinematic history by courting nostalgia but then amps up the spectacle. And what’s wrong with that? It’s his ties to the same ideas that fascinated George Lucas where The Rise of Skywalker fitfully entertains as an end to the Star Wars saga.
12-19-19
Marriage Story
Posted in Comedy, Drama, Romance with tags 2019 on December 17, 2019 by Mark HobinAt first glance, it would appear that Marriage Story is a paean to love given that title. It begins eloquently, with a wife’s declaration about all the things she loves about her husband. He too expresses lovely thoughts about her and we hear both of them as voiceover monologues in the respective voice of each writer. However, this is a narrative from the mind of filmmaker Noah Baumbach who brought us acidic works like The Squid and the Whale and Margot at the Wedding. It turns out those letters were written under the direction of a therapist. The two are having a counseling session. In fact, this account is a tale about a couple getting a divorce.
Marriage Story is a fully realized take on a disintegrating relationship. Noah Baumbach knows a thing or two about this subject because it’s a fictionalized version of his very real split in 2013 from actress Jennifer Jason Leigh. Since then he has indeed tempered his caustic takes on relationships with warmth (Frances Ha, While We’re Young). The chronicle evades the upbeat tone of those recent efforts, but it’s in the carefully presented details where he captivates the viewer. Noah Baumbach’s screenplay acknowledges that separation is painful but the depiction is extracted from a place of affection and understanding. It’s both intimate and unique which makes this feature refreshingly realistic.
Anyone will tell you that a lifelong union is about compromise. Divorce is about the inability to concede. A lot of this couple’s disagreements focus on where the family will ultimately live. Adam Driver’s Charlie is a New York guy. He’s in the theater and writes plays. Scarlett Johansson’s Nicole has a TV pilot that’s taking off and so she prefers LA. They also have an eight-year-old son together. Obviously, young Henry (Azhy Robertson) can’t live in both places at the same time so this is where their problem lays.
Marriage Story is a fascinating saga where very little happens, but so much is said. This is simply about getting to know two people and why they can no longer stay married. This is where the movie comes alive. The talk is the action. The dialogue is elegant, witty, sharp, funny, and quick. Their problems really don’t seem all that bad in the beginning. I mean, nothing so unsolvable that several good discussions might fix. But as things develop we get a nuanced snapshot of how their relationship has deteriorated past the point of no return. Nowhere is this more evident than in the decision to involve outside counsel. They initially agree to amicably separate without the use of lawyers. Then Nicole hires one (Laura Dern) and things deteriorate steadily from there.
Marriage Story is highlighted by a whole ensemble of compelling performances. It goes without saying that the power of this film rests on the authenticity of acting from main stars Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver. The skill of thespian achievement doesn’t end with them. I could write a whole paragraph about Laura Dern. The greatest lawyers must savagely but intelligently manipulate laws. As attorney Nora Fanshaw, Dern is absolutely brilliant at conveying understanding toward her client and utter contempt for her opponent. She’s beautifully nasty. Alan Alda and Ray Liotta also play advocates for Charlie’s side at different points. One is sensitive (but ineffective) at his profession. The other is a pit bull. You can figure out who plays which.
So who is to blame? The depiction is sure to incite a debate. Given this is a personal tale from Noah Baumbach, you’d expect a more sympathetic viewpoint for the man. Yet I found it to be an even-handed presentation of the two sides. For example, it doesn’t sidestep the ugly fact that Charlie actually cheated on Nicole even though their breakup isn’t due to his immoral act. At one point, Bert Spitz (Alan Alda) asserts, “Criminal lawyers see bad people at their best; divorce lawyers see good people at their worst.” Noah Baumbach may not have originated that cogent declaration, but he perfectly utilizes it in his crackerjack screenplay. It’s in the little details where the movie soars. Charlie and Nicole both have their redeeming features and failings. Why Charlie’s at fault vs. why Nicole is to be condemned is an interesting conversation. I could go on and on giving precise details as to why for each, but that’s why you need to see this film. Marriage Story is a heartbreakingly effective portrait of how love fades where it once blossomed.
12-06-19
Jumanji: The Next Level
Posted in Action, Adventure, Comedy, Family with tags 2019 on December 15, 2019 by Mark HobinI didn’t expect much from Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle in 2017. I was pleasantly surprised. The feature was a fun adventure about four kids in the real world that inhabited the bodies of visually disparate avatars in a video game. The joke was how their personalities were matched up. For example, the shy nerdy boy (Alex Wolff) became a strong confident explorer (Dwayne Johnson) and a pretty but ditzy, self-centered girl (Madison Iseman) was reborn as a pudgy male archeologist (Jack Black). The concept was both innovative and funny. It wasn’t great art but it succeeded because it was entertaining.
Audiences loved the first film and positive word of mouth propelled a healthy run in theaters. It grossed over $962 million worldwide so it was only a matter of time before we got this inevitable sequel. Once again Jumanji: The Next Level essentially relies on the very same gag with a slight twist. The difference this time is that each protagonist is now inhabiting a different body in the simulated fantasy. So Dwayne Johnson, Kevin Hart, Jack Black, and Karen Gillan are all back but with the added “novelty” to act in a different manner.
The proceedings are essentially a tired rehash of the previous film, but there are bright spots. The script also attempts to inject new life by adding 2 old people. The scribes have introduced two characters in the real world. Danny De Vito portrays Spencer’s grandfather Eddie and Danny Glover pops up as Eddie’s estranged friend. They are both sucked into the video game adventure. Their temperaments are good for a few laughs. Also, breakout star and current “It Girl” Awkwafina plays an additional avatar within the video game. Awkwafina stands out. She’s a legitimately good actress so she’s effective at manifesting distinctive identities. Kevin Hart downplays his more intense charisma by talking much slower which is rather amusing in itself.
However, the story is a complete snooze. Actor Rory McCann impersonates this “Game of Thrones” style warlord named Jurgen the Brutal. He’s stolen a necklace called the Falcon’s Heart and the gang must get it back and expose it to the sun so they may end the drought that has infected the land and yada yada yada.
A fresh idea can no longer captivate when it’s simply repeated with more clutter. This narrative is undone by a screenplay that is content to check the boxes of a formula to safely produce another hit in the same vein. Writers Jake Kasdan (who also returns as director), Jeff Pinkner and Scott Rosenberg barely tweak the formula to produce this generic hit. The first half of the movie relies more on the characters so it genially coasts on the talents of its cast but in the 2nd half, the chronicle dwells far too long on a convoluted story. I just didn’t give a care. The final 30 minutes is a difficult sit. The saga runs over two hours when it should’ve been a brisk 90 minutes. So ultimately Jumanji: The Next Level turns out to be a level down from its predecessor.
12-12-19
Honey Boy
Posted in Drama with tags 2019 on December 12, 2019 by Mark HobinEver since actor Shia LaBeouf was arrested for drunk driving in 2008 the sordid events of his personal life have often overshadowed his work. He wrote this script based on his own life as a form of therapy while in rehab in 2017. While it may have helped him face his inner demons, those experiences should’ve remained on paper and never been acted out into an actual film. Someone once said great art comes from great pain. That person never saw this movie.
Honey Boy is a thoroughly unpleasant film. If I had to distill this meandering reminiscence into a plot, I’d say it was a random collection of hateful musings concerning a 12-year-old child actor named Otis Lort (Jupe) and his abusive father, James, played by Shia LaBeouf himself. Dad was once a rodeo clown but now is the child’s guardian. Together they live in a grubby looking extended-stay motel. His father has extreme difficulty living a well adjusted life. He is a convicted felon having served three years for rape. James has an argument with Otis’s mother (Natasha Lyonne) on the phone but not directly. He conveys his anger through his son. It’s an awkward exchange. He throws his mother’s boyfriend (Clifton Collins Jr.) in the pool. Later James punches his young son dead on in the face. A lot of other troublesome things happen too.
These details are randomly doled out without any sense of dramatic thrust. The ostensible purpose is to present the idea that daddy was a bad man. However, even that portrait is suspect. The vignettes are so anecdotal that it’s hard to tell whether we can even trust the filmmakers’ point of view. We haphazardly learn about his father by putting the pieces of a narrative that is composed of plot threads. Some of these recollections occasionally jump to an older 22-year-old version of Otis in rehab played by Lucas Hedges. Incidentally, Hedges and Jupe look absolutely nothing alike but I concede that may have been an intentional artistic choice.
Shia LaBeouf, Lucas Hedges, and Noah Jupe are talented actors. There is a certain amount of emotional nuance and technical craft that shapes these performances, but to what end? A drama should entertain with a sense of purpose. If the production mainly functions as an irritation then perhaps the effort is wasted. Ultimately nothing is resolved. The whole exercise seems self-indulgent. That is to say, it isn’t entertaining for us as an audience but it allows Shia to grapple with his psychological problems. Although I don’t get the idea after having watched this story that Shia has changed in any meaningful way. In a truly meta moment, the two have a conversation about the picture we are literally watching right now. Otis promises his dad that he will make a movie about him one day. “Well alright,” James says, “make me look good honey boy.’” It would appear that Shia still has some unresolved issues to work through.
11-25-19
The Irishman
Posted in Biography, Crime, Drama with tags 2019 on December 5, 2019 by Mark HobinThe Irishman has been a labor of love 10 years in the making for Marin Scorsese. What’s not to like? You’ve got an esteemed filmmaker working within his wheelhouse of gangster movies. This is a genre the filmmaker does very well. Despite the superlatives you may have heard, it’s not his best work, but it is still very compelling.
The Irishman highlights a trio of great performances. There’s the irresistible opportunity to watch Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci reunite with director Martin Scorsese. They last worked together in Casino. Now let’s add Al Pacino to the cast, an actor who has surprisingly never worked with Scorsese. The chronicle is a sprawling epic about Frank Sheeran (Robert De Niro) who was an American labor union official. The story is told from his insider’s point of view as we follow his trajectory from World War II veteran to truck driver to hitman for the Philly mob and eventual union leader. His personality is focused and driven in brutal behavior but oddly detached. He has very little qualms about his murderous actions.
Sheeran meets Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci) the head of the Northeastern Pennsylvania crime family. Joe Pesci is back in his first major screen role in almost a decade. Here he gives a very un-Pesci like performance. He made a name for himself playing flamboyant individuals in Goodfellas, Home Alone, My Cousin Vinny and Lethal Weapons 2,3, & 4. Here he subverts expectations with his understated display. He’s reserved but powerful. There’s a subtle brilliance to the performance. Bufalino subsequently introduces Sheeran to Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino), the forceful President of the Teamsters Union. For me, this is where the production really takes off. Once Al Pacino shows up portraying the labor union leader, the film gets its focus. He is unquestionably the MVP of this production. The chronicle becomes more engaging, particularly in the last hour where it builds to its conclusion.
The Irishman presents itself as a narrative account of history. The movie is a fascinating tale that begins with Frank Sheeran as an old man reflecting on the details of his life. Screenwriter Steven Zaillian adapts the drama based on the 2004 book I Heard You Paint Houses by investigator Charles Brandt. The book was based on his interviews with Frank Sheeran. Given its $150 million budget, this is Martin Scorsese’s most expensive production. For that you can thank costly CGI that de-ages these septuagenarians over the course of their lives. Much has been written about this decision. I noticed it at first, then accepted the technique after a while. It was never an issue after that. I don’t see it as any different than using prosthetics and makeup to artificially age an actor. It’s just that we now have the technology to this in reverse. Having these three actors playing the same role over the course of a lifetime gives their characters an added weight and poignancy. That emotional gravitas wouldn’t have been present if distinct actors had been cast at various stages. It adds to the extensive, all-encompassing nature of the saga.
The narrative recounts the events over 50 years. Whether Sheeran’s confessions are the gospel truth is certainly up for debate, but they do make a gripping — albeit taxing — tale. Given its three and a half hours, the aggressive runtime puts this squarely in the company of legendary works like Gone With the Wind, Ben-Hur, and Lawrence of Arabia. Those films justified their extreme length in a way that this film does not. I blame lots of little extended comedic vignettes that pop up occasionally. While amusing, the inclusion of so many doesn’t vindicate the extended runtime. However I still highly recommend this feature.
How you watch this movie will undoubtedly affect your enjoyment. In the past, cinema of this length was originally shown with an intermission. When The Irishman received a limited theatrical release on November 1, 2019, it was exhibited with no break whatsoever. Then it was subsequently made available on digital streaming through Netflix on November 27, less than a month later. I saw The Irishman on Netflix which is appropriate. That’s how the majority of the world will see this film. My experience was not confined to a seat for nearly four hours but rather over the span of two nights where I had the option of using a pause button. Seeing it at home provides the freedom to use the restroom, grab something to eat, or the opportunity to confirm just how many gangster movies Marin Scorsese has actually directed.* I thoroughly enjoyed it in that way.
11-27-19
* It’s six by the way (Mean Streets, Goodfellas, Casino, Gangs of New York, The Departed, The Irishman).
Knives Out
Posted in Comedy, Crime, Drama with tags 2019 on December 3, 2019 by Mark HobinAt first glance, Knives Out would appear to be a retro throwback to the classic whodunit-style mysteries that Agatha Christie wrote. Additionally, it appears to suggest the kind of thrillers that made Hitchcock famous. That certainly raises the bar with me. I adore both of those things and so I was primed to enjoy this. Filmmaker Rian Johnson both writes and directs this feature, which is something he has always done on his films. He also serves as a producer for the first time. He’s a clever individual. Perhaps too clever. By that, I mean that the production is extremely meta. It’s fully aware of TV shows like Columbo and Murder She Wrote as well as movies like Sleuth, Deathtrap, and Clue. Rian wants to exploit that knowledge but subvert the audience’s expectations at the same time.
Knives Out is unquestionably a fun film. It flies by over its extended 130-minute running time. The production design is a character in itself. The setting is a palatial Victorian mansion in Massachusetts. This allows us to have the most amazing art direction. This includes quirky antiques, weird sculptures, giant paintings, bear rugs, and an impressive knife collection that is arranged as a huge circle that looks like a halo pointing at the head of anyone who steps in front of it. Never underestimate the power of an exquisite estate. The digs are pretty swanky and the gorgeous environment infuses the trappings with enough style to gloss over any lulls in the chatty proceedings.
The production is distinguished by a charismatic cast. There’s the murder victim Harlan Thrombey (Christopher Plummer). A trio arrives to investigate: two police detectives (Lakeith Stanfield and Noah Segan) and more importantly, one private detective portrayed by Daniel Craig. He’ll take center stage in the investigation. He chews the scenery with a ridiculous accent as Detective Benoit Blanc to learn the truth. His animated vocal inflections call to mind Foghorn Leghorn — that larger than life cartoon rooster. I say boy I say… I do declare that his performance is an enjoyable display.
There’s also a colorful house of suspects which include Jamie Lee Curtis, Michael Shannon, Don Johnson, and Toni Collette. They’re all great in their own unique ways but I could watch Toni Collette read the phone book and appreciate her oratory skills. Here she’s portraying a Paltrow-esque head of a beauty company called Flam. Later Chris Evans shows up performing the part of a villainous playboy named Hugh Ransom Drysdale. He seizes our attention playing a spoiled brat in his luxurious white cable knit sweater. I don’t know if a movie can get an Oscar nomination for Best Costume Design simply based on an article of clothing but given the buzz on social media, this film could set a precedent. Ana de Armas is the acting newcomer as Harlan Thrombey’s nurse. Her immigrant status is a very calculated and conscious choice to suit the political zeitgeist in 2019. Regardless, she solidly holds her own in a pivotal role amidst a much more experienced cast.
Rian Johnson is keen on undermining expectations. He deconstructs the whodunit in a way that plays with convention. It’s not just about who did it, but also why and how. These tidbits are revealed in a way that feels like the script is oh-so-very pleased with itself. It’s snarky and knowing. I suppose this is obligatory in 2019. We have to up our game to account for our modern sensibility. What I expected and what I got were somewhat different things. You ultimately have to ask yourself this question: Does Rian Johnson’s vision improve upon the time-honored sophistication of a straight-ahead mystery? I’m not entirely sure. It’s offbeat. Although it’s hard to warmly embrace the smug self-satisfaction that emanates from the proceedings. Still, I admire the unconventionality of a winking screenplay so beautifully dressed up in a lavish production.
11-22-19