PhotobucketLawless, as its generic title implies, plays out like a direct-to-video crime drama. Ok I won’t mince words. Lawless is a stupefying bore. You’d think any movie concerning gangsters in 1931 would be nothing but nonstop excitement but you’d be wrong in this case. This story is about as distinctive as slice of Wonder Bread. Oops scratch that, Wonder Bread actually has some nutrients you can use.

Forrest, Howard and Jack are the Bondurant Brothers. They’re bootleggers in Franklin County, Virginia and their family is the stuff of local folklore. Eldest brother Forrest has survived the Spanish Flu that took his parents. It’s believed that he can’t die. Indeed Forrest must be part feline because he clearly has 9 lives. He survives a violent throat slashing, being shot multiple times and falling into a frozen lake. It’s pretty ridiculous. Anyway the brothers run a successful moonshine business that ultimately attracts the attention of crooked lawman Charlie Rakes. He demands a cut of their illegal racket. They tell him to get lost and so begins a back and forth game of one-upmanship throughout the rest of the film. In between the occasional bursts of violence we get lots of static shots of landscapes.

The cast is what attracted me to this saga. Ironically it’s the incredible assemblage of talent that makes this drama so frustrating. They aren’t given anything exciting to do. I kept waiting for something riveting to happen. Tom Hardy portrays the oldest (and much larger) brother to Shia LaBeouf’s character. Hardy mumbles and croaks his way through this picture, but he has a presence. Shia is the runt of the family. I guess it’s commendable that he’s attempting to stretch his historical acting muscles as one of the Bondurant brothers, but he’s out of his depth here. They don‘t seem remotely like siblings. Hardy has more charisma in his upper lip that Shia has in his whole body. Guy Pearce stridently overacts as the corrupt special agent. He’s fascinating, so a welcome addition. Jessica Chastain and Mia Wasikowska are fine in underwritten roles as “the girlfriends.“ At least Jessica Chastain looks ravishing amongst all these grimy outlaws. Gary Oldman pops up in a brief cameo as sympathetic criminal Floyd Banner. And then poof he’s gone.

The script attempts to depict these brothers as visionaries. It’s based on a 2008 book called The Wettest County in the World by Matt Bondurant. The production values are gorgeous. It gives the film the look of quality. And the soundtrack is dominated by folksy bluegrass songs the way movies set in the 60s flood the soundtrack with #1 hits of that era. The author was glorifying his grandfather and great-uncles. It’s obvious he wants them to appear as mythic heroes in a Prohibition-era fantasy. But Nick Cave’s screenplay (Yes that Nick Cave, of the Bad Seeds) turns them into rather dull outlaw clichés of the day. Forrest’s girlfriend Maggie rebukes Forrest at one point and says “Ain’t that just like you, to believe your own damn legend.” She sees right through them and so do we. They’re simply a bunch of guys making moonshine during a time when such activities was against the law. This is thoroughly conventional material. I struggled to see why their story deserved a film. These people aren’t legendary. Yes, the period is fertile ground for stories. The script should’ve been a slam dunk in entertainment, but it falters on two counts. Not only does it fail to make these criminals admirable, it can’t even make them seem interesting. Lawless is aimless.

19 Responses to “Lawless”

  1. I love when you get a little mean in your reviews! haha This one had A LOT of potential, especially considering that amazing cast. Too bad it didn’t deliver.


  2. Love your review, Mark.  I’d bet it was more entertaining than the movie itself; glad I can rely on you to tone down if not kill the slight curiosity I have with these kinds of films.  I especially loved your comments about Wonder Bread and one of the brothers being practically invulnerable lol.

    I saw a trailer for Lawless yesterday when I went to see The Bourne Legacy.  From the very beginning of the trailer, it didn’t look like a great movie at all, and the fact that anyone thinks that a film will market better if Shia LeBeouf’s name is rolled first, is an automatic turnoff.  I barely remember what happened in the trailer (other than a sneak peek for Zero Dark Thirty coming along afterward to grab my attention), so I’d probably fall asleep during the entirety of the movie.


  3. Good review Mark. The ensemble cast did a great job with each of their roles and the violence was very bloody and violent, the way I usually like it. The problem was, this story was a bit too slow for me to fully get involved with right off the bat.


    • I agree that the ensemble cast was mostly good with one exception, Shia LaBeouf was painfully miscast. But I have to wonder what attracted great actresses like Jessica Chastain and Mia Wasikowska to the script. Their “girlfriend” characters are such a step down from the interesting parts they usually play.


  4. This movie needed more action. Great stars, disappointing performances. I didn’t believe this one bit. Tom Harding could never had survived any of these near death experiences.


  5. I guess we are now in studio dump month. I can’t stand movies that have potential and can’t live up to it. Wanderlust was like that, terrible movie from start to finish.


  6. Great review even though I disagree. I did think that the story wasn’t anything new since we’ve seen it many times before and that it felt very un-realistic at many moments but in the end I thought the performances were great and it held my interest the whole time.


  7. nice review mark. i look forward to period movies partly because of its production values (The Untouchables for example). but it sounds like the story and performances of this one were too disappointing.


  8. I disagree massively (my review was all about my love for the film)…but still thoroughly enjoyed your review and all the points you made!

    I’m beginning to think that NO ONE can quite stand Shia LaBeouf…except maybe his mum. He is quite irritating isn’t he?


  9. Nice review, you and I had a very similar reaction to the movie, it looks great, and great attention to detail for the setting, but the characters are poorly written and hard to get interested in. Similar thoughts in my review:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: