Anna Karenina

PhotobucketSalt & pepper, peanut butter & jelly, Keira Knightly & period pieces. These pairings go together as if they were designed to be united. I must admit I’m a bit biased in Keira’s favor when it comes to these types of costume dramas. She has a timelessness that seems to fit theses epics like hand in glove. Alright enough with the similes. Anna Karenina is an adaptation of the 1877 Leo Tolstoy classic, a tour de force of Russian literature. It’s a book of enduring popularity, beloved the world over.  Having been dramatized many many times, most famously in a 1935 version starring Greta Garbo and Fredric March, the question must be asked. How to make the text appear fresh and new for a modern audience?

Joe Wright has a singular vision. The English director has made the fascinating decision to lens the film in its virtual entirety on a single soundstage in an old abandoned theater. You might think this would be severely limiting, but surprisingly this is far from the case. The achievement is a set designer’s dream. The colors, costumes and cinematography complement a production that is so deliberately lavish in its presentation, I stopped breathing at moments it was so impressive. Italian composer Dario Marianelli composed the score, and it’s suitably lush romanticism complements the gorgeous visuals. I dare say, there is a carefully studied artistic expression here that I have rarely seen since Black Narcissus or The Red Shoes. High praise that I do not bestow lightly.

This is director Joe Wright’s third collaboration with leading lady Keira Knightly following Pride & Prejudice (2005) and Atonement (2007). By now the two clearly have a simpatico relationship that benefits the other. He utilizes her to full effect taking advantage of her strengths in the title role. She has a quality that suits any age, perfectly conveying the emotional depth the part requires. She isn’t the most likeable heroine. In fact I didn’t sympathize with Anna much. Given the hypocrisy on display, I think I was supposed to. However she is mesmerizing. The idea to cast Jude Law as Alexei Karenin, her stodgy husband, is an inspired choice. Normally Jude Law would be too young and handsome to depict a man 20 years her senior, but he sports a tremendous moustache and beard to hide his countenance. I quite enjoyed his portrayal as he comes across as rather sympathetic and not as stuffy as Karenin is often portrayed. He actually seems a pretty forgiving chap the way he puts up with her infidelity. Aaron Taylor-Johnson plays the dashing Count Vronsky. There is a slight narcissism in his performance. His posturing suggests he just might be as enamored with himself as he is with Anna. The youthful actor is virtually unrecognizable in blonde hair and blue contacts as the affluent rogue who sweeps her off her feet.  It wasn’t until after seeing the picture that I googled his (new) name and realized this was in fact the same star of KickAss and Savages.

Anna Karenina is a cinematic feast. Director Joe Wright’s re-envisioning of the cherished novel treats the material with the reverence it deserves, but represents the production in a hyper-realized theatrical treatment that beautifully befits the story. Wright does a masterful job at condensing Tolstoy’s 800 page monolith into a manageable 2 hour feature. He expertly juggles a large cast of characters giving each the time they’re due without taking away from the central plot at hand. I was completely wrapped up in Anna’s story. And the way he renders the narrative, is genius. It is a sumptuous sight to behold that embraces the super-stylized construction of a play. Office workers stamp papers in staccato unison to the music like percussion, and then uniformly stand and sit in succession. When Count Vronsky and Anna first waltz on the dance floor of an elegant ballroom, the resulting movement is a meticulously choreographed ballet. The dancing couples remain frozen then move when Anna and Vronsky pass by them. Its conceptual style may not enrapture some, but the cinephile in me was entranced. I enjoyed every shrouded whisper, every conspicuous glare, and every angry declaration. Anna Karenina is a celebration of the medium. It is the very reason why one escapes into the fantasy of a movie and out of the reality of everyday life.

Advertisements

20 Responses to “Anna Karenina”

  1. I was really excited for this one. My mother was going to take me to see it (she being interested as well), but my father said it was “porn.” Which I very highly doubt.

    Your review was great. I was actually surprised you enjoyed it so much, but maybe it IS that great.

    • What director Joe Wright does in Anna Karenina is quite audacious. He takes a risk and like any great work of art, when you take a chance, some will praise it as being innovative and others will decry it as bizarre. I’m firmly entrenched in the former camp obviously.

  2. Terrific review! I read many negative opinions on this one, so I’m still not sure about seeing it on the big screen, I don’t like it when the main appeal in the movie is the visual side and the story is just an addition, but I do love Wright’s previous movies with the exception of The Soloist.

    • Perhaps I am not as connected to the source novel as some. I love plays and the way they’re dramatized so I didn’t mind the style choices Joe Wright makes.

      P.S. I’ve tried leaving comments on your site. For whatever reason they don’t post, but know that I have been reading your reviews, Sati. 🙂

  3. Martin Bradley Says:

    An excellent review to an excellent movie. I was surprised how much I liked it. It opened in the UK a couple of months ago and then I thought it would be a big Oscar contender but I’m not so sure it has taken off in the US to the same extent.

    • I would’ve thought so too. I think the purists of Leo Tolstoy’s work are a bit taken aback by the liberal style choices the director employs. I think it adds to the beauty of the film. We shall see. Thanks for commenting.

  4. WOW, such a high rating. Glad you enjoyed it Mark. I actually was reading Tolstoy book when the casting was announced, and suffice to say I’m not fond of Keira’s casting. She’s good in period dramas yes, but I don’t know if she could convey the depth of Anna. I might just rent this one for the set pieces, it strikes me as more style than substance.

    • I guess when the visual style of a film is so impressive, there’s a danger it can overshadow the drama. This is a faithful rendering of the Tolstoy novel. If you feel the orginal story has substance, then i think this should be quite captivating.

  5. I also give this 4 1/2 stars. The visual aspects of the movie were fantastic. I thought the acting was superb by all the characters. I’ve become a fan of the Kiera Knightly/ Joe Wright collaborations. Bravo!

    • The acting really was superb. I didn’t even mention Kelly Macdonald as Dolly, the woman who is confronted with her husband’s adultery. Matthew Macfadyen as Oblonsky, said philanderer (and Anna’s brother). Domhnall Gleeson as Konstantin Levin, the socially awkward, but sincere landowner who courts beautiful Kitty played by Alicia Vikander and Ruth Wilson as Princess Betsy, cold and vicious as the young morally liberal social butterfly.

      Incredible cast!

  6. Beautiful review, Mark! I was looking forward to see this one but now I’m even more excited after reading your review. I love keira Knightley. I think she’s fantastic and I don’t get the hate for her. Jude Law is pretty awesome, too. And I really liked Wright’s Atonement.

  7. Heh. Yeahhh… you’re definitely higher on this one than I was, but I’ll back you up that it is a good movie, at least 🙂

    I wasn’t very “wowed” by Knightley, but you are right about Joe Wright. He does some pretty bold things with this film, and that certainly winds up being the major talking point for me.

  8. I enjoyed this film, not as much as you did, but it was still enjoyable. I will say that the production design was just fantastic, I instantly fell in love with it.

  9. This looks great. The review, even better. I’m now following. If you wouldn’t care, and if have some spare time, check out what I’ve got to say about film as well! @ digitalshortbread.com

  10. Oh boy, definitely one we highly disagree on, but those happen every now and then 🙂 I almost felt like I misjudged it after reading your review, but then I remembered back to how I felt after walking out of the theater. Definitely a good write up though, you make a good case for it

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: