mother_ver5STARS4“World in My Eyes” was a hit song by Depeche Mode back in 1990. The lyics are notably apropos in this context. “Let me take you on a trip” it began, but these words could just as easily been uttered by Darren Aronofsky. He approaches the movie landscape in very much the same way. His cinematic vision is to take the viewer on a trip through a heretofore unexplored world. Requiem for a Dream, The Fountain, Black Swan – these are not easily digestible films. His latest is Mother! It’s also an idiosyncratic foray through style right down to the lowercase ‘m’ and exclamation point that usually delineates the title whenever it’s in print. (Not here though. I’m still going to capitalize the title of a film.)  This drama might be his most bizarre and from the online discussion, perhaps the hardest to like. Nonetheless, I found this bold excursion a captivating decent into insanity. It’s such a gradual progression that I was unprepared to where he ultimately took me. It’s not an easy trip but it is a fascinating one.

WARNING: This is the type of movie that plays better the less you know. Conversely, the more you read, the less befuddled you’ll be. With that said, I certainly won’t explicate the chronicle in detail. I don’t believe there is a definitive explanation anyway. I’ve heard several interpretations and honestly, they all have merit. Besides, this is a film review, not a thesis. Yet Mother! is just the kind of achievement on which you could write a dissertation. As such, to review it properly, I will make allusions to other works that may take away some of the mystery. If you prefer to go in cold (and you like the same movies I like) then stop reading now and just go see it, because this earns my recommendation.

Mother! tells the story of an unnamed couple who are refurbishing a Victorian mansion in the countryside. He (Javier Bardem) is a poet and his wife (Jennifer Lawrence), is a homemaker. She is the mother of the title, renovating the home and making it beautiful. Their tranquil existence is soon disturbed by the arrival of a man (Ed Harris) looking for a place to stay. He thinks their home is a bed and breakfast. The poet is accommodating and mother defers to her husband’s wishes. The next day, the man’s wife shows up also looking to stay. Their presence is an irritant to the mother but the poet seems to welcome their company. Apparently, the strangers are fans of the poet’s writing. Nevertheless, they impose a possessive influence over their home. Their occupation becomes even more irritating when the two sons of their guests show up as well. From there, things begin to deteriorate rapidly.

Mother! initially, unfolds like a play with the four principals forming sort of a Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? quartet in the first half. Jennifer Lawrence is the doting wife. Javier Bardem is her distant, moody husband. At first, he is suffering from writer’s block. He’s seemingly insensitive to his spouse’s objections to these intruders. Things only get worse as his character becomes more and more celebrated. He takes and takes from his wife in a way that makes the observer uncomfortable. Yet Jennifer Lawrence continues to acquiesce to her husband’s wishes. Her doe-eyed demeanor may irritate viewers who judge her behavior through a feminist lens. I was reminded of The Giving Tree by Shel Silverstein. Ed Harris is a bit of an enigma as the man that enters their life. Michelle Pfeiffer is deliciously entertaining as his inquisitive wife. She asks intrusive questions, then makes herself at home with a familiarity that is vexing.

Mother! is a production that gets under your skin and it’s meant to be troubling and confusing. Aronofsky’s longtime cinematographer Matthew Libatique creates an unsettling vision for his protagonist. Jennifer Lawrence is frequently shot in close up. Other times the camera follows over her shoulder for 360 degree shots that put us in her shoes. The camera feels permanently attached to her. We see her point of view as she makes her way throughout this living space. Her disorientation is our own. In the first half, the setting is bereft of vibrant colors. The environment is gray and washed out, but as things escalate the hues steadily grow more vivid. Interestingly, there is no music. Initially, composer Jóhann Jóhannsson did compose a score. However, Aronofsky ultimately decided a lack of musical cues was preferable. Instead, the pair worked together in creating what they called a sound design. The absence of musical cues obfuscates our perception. How are we to feel? Without the score, it forces you to rely on Jennifer Lawrence’s character for narrative direction.

At a superficial glance, Mother! is a horror film, but it’s not scary in the classic sense. It’s unsettling. Like Roman Polanski’s Repulsion or Rosemary’s Baby, it reveals the painful undoing of a woman and her psyche. Even the film poster recalls the latter work.  Although as things devolve it’s clear there are larger issues at play. What begins as spare and spartan becomes dense and elaborate. An orderly tranquility is replaced by a surreal nightmare. The narrative transforms into a Hieronymus Bosch painting come to life. The pastiche of images gets a bit chaotic but it’s never less than a visually arresting work of grandeur. Mother! is a rich tapestry of images that will haunt your dreams. A blazing inferno is the very first image and it ends in a similar fashion. In between, we get a beating heart that bubbles up in the toilet bowl, a sickly man with an open wound, and floorboards that ooze blood. Everything converges in a chaotic finale that will leave some viewers exhilarated while others will jeer the screen. Mother! doesn’t “play well with others.” As a narrative, it’s socially ill-tempered. It’s also a meditative examination open to analysis.  It’s ideologically abstract enough to allow for many interpretations. Therein lies the genius of this tale.  It’s something to see with other people so you can discuss. It’s a cerebral experience and one that I appreciated for its audacity.


15 Responses to “Mother!”

  1. This was completely chaotic, in a good way. The acting was quite good. I thought Jennifer completely sold this character. Not used to seeing her in a powerless role. Nice change. Be prepared, this isn’t for everyone. Keep an open mind and enjoy. 3 1/2 stars


    • Jennifer Lawrence continues to prove she is one of the greatest actresses working today. This is a very difficult role and she pulled it off. Michelle Pfeiffer is playing it campy, but she’s good as well.


  2. I really liked this movie a lot. I decided to write a review for it for my school’s paper (should be up by the end of the week at if you want to read it) and I was disappointed when I realized how little I could actually say about it without spoiling it. Not quite as good as Black Swan or Requiem for a Dream, in my opinion, but easily as unsettling as either film; definitely a return to form after his last movie. I loved how it spent the first hour or so drawing us in with a slow, quiet atmosphere and then turned everything so chaotic all of a sudden near the end. And that one scene (you probably know the one to which I’m referring, although I don’t want to explicitly say which one since it’s a huge spoiler) freaked me out so badly. I literally blurted out “NO!” when it showed up. The last act also reminded me of Rosemary’s Baby, which I thought was pretty cool. Great review here.


    • Appreciate your very thoughtful comment.

      A good rule for recounting the plot is just to discuss what happens in the first 30 minutes – basically the set-up. Spoiling Mother! would be to explicate the film’s meaning in detail but I don’t think there is one interpretation anyway. This is a multifaceted film.

      I’m looking forward to reading your review.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. “‘Mother!’ doesn’t play well with others.” I love that! That’s it, in a nutshell. What a curiosity this thing is.

    The antagonism is strong with this one.


  4. It’s a nutty movie. But coming from Aronofsky, I wouldn’t expect much else. Nice review.


    • Darren Aronofsky is always eccentric, but this does set a new level — for him anyway. It’s not as accessible as say, Black Swan. The poor box office proves that but I still think this is easier to comprehend than some of David Lynch’s stuff.


  5. I agree that Mother! is a descent into insanity, but I can’t say that I found it captivating. I mostly just felt exhausted by it. The Giving Tree didn’t come to mind as I watched it, although I think you make a great comparison there. You’re also right that Michelle Pfeiffer deliciously entertaining. I love how Aronofsky shot her so that she’s such an intimidating presence when she’s on screen. I didn’t find myself confused by the movie at all. Instead I felt like it beat me over the head with metaphors, which annoyed me. I found it remarkably unsubtle and in places needlessly gross. I was not a fan.


  6. Man, this movie has really run the gamut of critical opinion. And your review excelldntly sums that up. I really want to see it soon.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: